For corporate legal departments facing a lot of litigation or frequent regulatory investigations, the high cost of eDiscovery feels unavoidable. But, by rethinking the role of humans in the discovery loop, GCs can substantially reduce what gets spent on labor-intensive review.

How? This guide explains.

For decades, the legal industry has equated human review with defensibility—rooms of contract attorneys, quality control layers, and privilege checkers. A labor-intensive stack was seen not just as thorough, but legally bulletproof.

But that belief has never been grounded in data.

Some legal departments continue to rely on staffing armies to do what machines can (finally) do in milliseconds. Others are adjusting to the fact that when humans interact with AI, the results often outperform what either could achieve alone. Indeed the gap is widening between those embracing this shift and those avoiding it.

Complete the form to get your copy, and see where your own approach fits in.